Feel free to leave me comments, but I'm not sure how often I'll check here. — Steven G. Johnson 23:07, 19 January 2007 (EST)
You removed my edits.
You called them vandalism ? Why ? Most are adding refererrals to the talk:EOOXML_ojections page which should be fine. I did not destroy the original issues.
Is it not allowed to question the validness of these objections ???? A lot of the stuff is either nonsense of even untrue. If I overwrite a statment about the binary formats not being secret with a link to where you can get them I find that a correct edit. The document is just filled with incorrect and out of context info. It should be fine to comment on that. If the validity of the issues can't be discussed how can they than be called valid. HAl 03:13, 10 February 2007 (EST)
- You are not attempting to add constructively to the document, just being argumentative. I'm not going to debate with you here. — Steven G. Johnson
- IF an objection is not valid or just plain wrong and I comment on that then it is argumentative I guess. It seems only negative OOXML commenting is constructive ??? HAl 04:15, 13 February 2007 (EST)